HOCl - The Only Safe Disinfectant Around Food

See my page “Vs. Ecolab Chemicals”.

HOCl vs Quats in Restaurants

Overview

Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and quaternary ammonium compounds (quats) are both widely used sanitizers in the restaurant and food service industry. However, recent trends and research highlight significant advantages of HOCl over quats, leading to a growing shift towards HOCl for maintaining food safety and sanitation standards.

Key Differences and Advantages

Feature	HOCl (Hypochlorous Acid)	Quats (Quaternary Ammonium Compounds)
Efficacy	Extremely effective; kills 99.99% of pathogens including listeria, Salmonella, E. coli, norovirus, influenza, and COVID^[1][2][3][4].	Effective against many bacteria and some viruses, but less effective against certain pathogens like norovirus^[3].
Safety	Non-toxic, non-irritating, safe for direct food contact and around people^{[1][2][3][4][5]}.	Can cause skin and respiratory irritation; not safe for direct food contact without rinsing^[3][5].
Residue	Leaves no harmful residues; reverts to water and a trace of salt^[3][5].	Leaves residues that require rinsing to avoid accumulation and potential health risks^[3][5].
Regulatory Compliance	Approved by CDC, FDA, EPA, and international agencies for use on food and in food prep areas^{[1][2][3][4][5]}.	Approved for many uses but with stricter handling and rinsing requirements^[3].
Environmental Impact	Eco-friendly; breaks down harmlessly, does not contaminate watercourses^[3][5].	Environmental concerns; persistent residues can contaminate water and soil, releasing heavy metals^[3].
Cost and Efficiency	Can be generated on-site at low cost (15–25 cents per gallon), rinse-free, reduces labor and water use^[2][4].	Typically purchased as ready-to-use products; may require additional rinsing and handling steps^[2][4].
Versatility	Can be used as a spray, dip, fog, or directly on food, surfaces, and equipment^[2][4].	Primarily used on surfaces; not suitable for direct food application^[3].

Practical Benefits for Restaurants

Superior Pathogen Control: HOCl is more effective than quats at eliminating a broader range of pathogens, including difficult-to-kill viruses like norovirus, which is a frequent cause of foodborne illness outbreaks in restaurants^[1][2][3][4].
Food Contact Safety: HOCl can be safely used on produce, meat, poultry, seafood, and food contact surfaces without the need for rinsing, unlike quats which require a rinse step to prevent residue^[3][5].
Worker and Customer Safety: HOCl is non-toxic and does not pose respiratory or skin risks to employees or customers, unlike quats which have been linked to health concerns with long-term exposure^[3][5].
Environmental Responsibility: HOCl is environmentally benign, breaking down into water and salt, while quats contribute to environmental pollution and bioaccumulation^[3][5].
Cost Savings and Efficiency: HOCl can be generated on-site, reducing costs, and its rinse-free nature saves time and water, increasing operational efficiency in fast-paced restaurant environments^[2][4].

Industry Trends

Regulatory and Consumer Pressure: With increasing awareness of food safety and environmental sustainability, restaurants are adopting HOCl to meet stricter standards and consumer expectations for cleanliness and safety^[5].
Enhanced Consumer Trust: Using HOCl demonstrates a proactive commitment to food safety, which can boost customer confidence and brand reputation^[3][5].

Conclusion

HOCl offers clear advantages over quats for restaurant sanitation. It is more effective against a wider range of pathogens, safer for direct food contact, environmentally friendly, cost-efficient, and easier to use. These benefits are driving a significant shift in the food service industry towards HOCl as the preferred sanitizer and disinfectant^{[1][2][3][4][5]}.

⁂